Challenging Climate
23. Luke Kemp on defining, evaluating and managing catastrophic climate risk
Dr Luke Kemp is a Research Associate at the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, University of Cambridge. He has a PhD in international relations from the ANU and previous experience as a senior economist at Vivid Economics. In this episode, Luke sheds light on a surprisingly understudied and overlooked topic – catastrophic climate risk. This episode explores catastrophic and extinction risk, why the topic is understudied, and how we can weigh out the catastrophic risks of climate change and solar geo-engineering.
Links:
- Luke Kemp’s profile
- Check out Luke’s paper, Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios
- Luke's paper on the risky perspective shift in temperature rises: Focus of the IPCC Assessment Reports has shifted to lower temperatures
- Cambridge release, Climate change: potential to end humanity is “dangerously underexplored”
- Additional reading: Catastrophic climate risks should be neither understated nor overstated (Burgess et al., 2022)
Dr Luke Kemp is a Research Associate at the Centre for the Study of Existential Risk, University of Cambridge. He has a PhD in international relations from the ANU and previous experience as a senior economist at Vivid Economics. In this episode, Luke sheds light on a surprisingly understudied and overlooked topic – catastrophic climate risk. This episode explores catastrophic and extinction risk, why the topic is understudied, and how we can weigh out the catastrophic risks of climate change and solar geo-engineering.
Links:
- Luke Kemp’s profile
- Check out Luke’s paper, Climate Endgame: Exploring catastrophic climate change scenarios
- Luke's paper on the risky perspective shift in temperature rises: Focus of the IPCC Assessment Reports has shifted to lower temperatures
- Cambridge release, Climate change: potential to end humanity is “dangerously underexplored”
- Additional reading: Catastrophic climate risks should be neither understated nor overstated (Burgess et al., 2022)